In Lausanne, as in other major Swiss cities, the signing of a lease contract is a key moment that determines the relationship between tenant and landlord. Contractual practices vary, but it’s common for landlords to introduce specific clauses to govern life in the rented accommodation. However, some of these clauses may be deemed unfair if they create a significant imbalance to the detriment of the tenant. For example, clauses imposing disproportionate restrictions on the use of the rented property, or unjustified additional charges, are often challenged. In Lausanne, tenants’ associations and lawyers specializing in tenancy law ensure that contracts are fair, and offer support in identifying problematic clauses before the lease is signed.
Unfair terms can take many forms in Swiss lease contracts. Among the most common are clauses that impose unjustified additional costs, such as management fees or charges that should normally be included in the rent. Another common form is clauses that excessively restrict tenants’ rights, such as the prohibition on subletting without reasonable justification. Clauses that restrict the tenant’s right to terminate the lease beyond what is provided for by law are also considered unfair. These types of clauses create an imbalance that benefits the lessor to the detriment of the lessee, which justifies their annulment by the courts. The typology of unfair clauses varies according to region and local specificities, but their identification is based on a principle of proportionality and respect for good faith between the parties, as well as on the identification of imperative clauses in the Swiss Code of Obligations, which cannot be derogated from.
Swiss legislation on lease contracts has evolved in recent years to provide a better framework for abusive practices. The main aim of these reforms is to strengthen the protection of parties against clauses that unjustifiably restrict their rights. For example, clarifications have been made on the nature of charges that can be imposed on tenants, and on the conditions for early termination of the lease by the lessor. These developments were partly prompted by increasingly precise case law on the question of unfair terms, notably in decisions handed down by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. These decisions have helped to define more precisely the contours of lessees’ and lessors’ rights in the face of contested contractual provisions. The legislative reforms are designed to harmonize practices and provide a clearer legal framework for players in the rental market, while ensuring a balance between tenant protection and lessors’ contractual freedom.
Tenants in Switzerland have a number of tools at their disposal to protect themselves against unfair clauses in lease contracts. In particular, they can appeal to the Conciliation Commission to challenge clauses they consider to be disadvantageous. The conciliation commissions, which are present in every canton, examine the validity of clauses and can propose amicable solutions to resolve disputes. In Lausanne, tenants have access to specialized associations and to lawyers specializing in tenancy law, who provide legal advice and support. In addition, Swiss legislation allows tenants to request the nullity of clauses that create a manifest imbalance between the parties, thus guaranteeing a degree of protection against abuse. These measures are essential to ensure decent, stable housing for tenants, by limiting contractual abuses by landlords.
The most common unfair clauses in lease contracts often concern unjustified restrictions on the tenant’s use of the property. For example, prohibitions on subletting without good reason, severe restrictions on the presence of pets, or clauses requiring work to be carried out by the tenant are frequently considered unfair. Another category concerns additional charges not explicitly mentioned when the lease is signed, such as extra administrative or management fees. In Switzerland, such clauses can be challenged before the courts, which assess whether they comply with the principles of good faith and proportionality. Judges then analyze whether the clause creates a significant imbalance between the obligations of the two parties, and whether the tenant was clearly informed of the scope of the clause before signing the contract.
Swiss case law on unfair terms has helped to clarify the rights and obligations of the parties in lease contracts. On several occasions, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court has annulled clauses deemed too restrictive for tenants, notably those relating to ancillary costs or excessive restrictions on the use of the property. For example, court rulings may, in certain cases, consider clauses imposing unjustified management fees on the tenant to be null and void. Case law also emphasizes the importance of transparency and clarity in lease contracts. Vague or ambiguous clauses can be interpreted in favor of the tenant, if their application leads to an imbalance. These decisions are often cited as references by conciliation boards and lawyers specializing in tenancy law to defend the interests of tenants and landlords.
Restrictions imposed on tenants in lease contracts must respect certain limits to be considered valid. In Switzerland, clauses that disproportionately restrict the tenant’s use of the property are often considered abusive. For example, an absolute prohibition on subletting or minor alterations to the interior layout can be challenged if it is not based on legitimate justification on the part of the landlord. The courts assess the necessity of such restrictions on a case-by-case basis, checking whether they are intended to protect the property or seek to limit the tenant’s rights unjustifiably. Judges take into account the context and the interests of both parties to determine whether the clause constitutes a reasonable limitation or an infringement of the tenant’s rights.
When an unfair clause is identified in a lease contract, it is considered null and void, meaning that it has no binding effect on the tenant. In Switzerland, a clause recognized as unfair by a court can lead to a modification of the contract, either by deleting the clause or adapting it to more balanced conditions, or even to cancellation of the contract as such. The courts ensure that the nullity of the clause does not compromise the contract as a whole, but only corrects the contentious aspects. In addition, the lessee may claim compensation if he or she has suffered prejudice as a result of the application of an unfair clause. Such compensation may include reimbursement of unduly charged fees or compensation for abusive restrictions imposed.
Swiss tenants have the right to challenge a clause in their lease that they consider unfair. This right is based on the principles of proportionality and good faith, fundamental to the law of obligations. In the event of disagreement over a specific clause, the tenant can refer the matter to the Conciliation Commission to request a review of the disputed clause. The commissions then examine the validity of the clause in the light of the interests of both parties and legal housing requirements, and attempt to reach an amicable agreement between the parties. The tenant can also take the dispute to court to have the clause annulled, by providing evidence of its abusive nature. This right to dispute is essential to preserve the contractual balance between lessor and lessee, and to ensure that lease contracts meet the expected standards of fairness and transparency.
In Lausanne, the steps involved in contesting an unfair clause generally begin with an attempt at amicable settlement between tenant and landlord. The tenant can explain in writing why the clause is unfair or disproportionate, and ask for it to be amended. If direct dialogue fails, the tenant can lodge a formal request with the Conciliation Commission. A hearing is then scheduled, at which each party presents its arguments, and the Commission issues a conciliation proposal. In the event of persistent disagreement, the tenant can take the matter to court. This procedure makes it possible to check whether the clause complies with legal standards and, if necessary, to correct the contractual injustice.
In Switzerland, tenants also have the option of negotiating directly with their landlord to have unfair clauses amended. This informal approach can sometimes lead to a quicker, more flexible solution than legal proceedings. When a tenant feels that a clause is too restrictive or disadvantageous, he or she can propose reasonable modifications that benefit both parties. In some cases, the lessor may be open to a compromise to avoid protracted litigation. For example, a clause prohibiting all subletting can be amended to allow exceptions under certain conditions, thus ensuring greater flexibility for the tenant while protecting the lessor’s interests. Negotiation thus helps maintain a good rental relationship and resolve disputes pragmatically.
A number of cases in Switzerland illustrate the success of tenants who have challenged unfair clauses in their lease contracts. For example, some tenants were able to obtain the removal of unjustified management fees or the modification of clauses restricting the use of the leased property. In a recent case, a tenant challenged a clause imposing additional charges for minor maintenance work, arguing that these should be borne by the landlord. In such cases, the court may rule in favor of the tenant, finding that the clause created an imbalance to the tenant’s detriment. These examples demonstrate the importance of knowing one’s rights and challenging clauses that seem unfair. They also show that courts and conciliation boards take into account the specific situation of each party to render fair decisions.
To ensure balanced lease contracts and avoid unfair clauses, it is essential to follow certain recommendations when drafting and signing contracts. On the one hand, lessors should refrain from introducing restrictions or obligations that create a significant imbalance to the detriment of the lessee. For example, clauses imposing additional charges or severely restricting the tenant’s rights of use should be carefully examined. Real estate professionals recommend clear, transparent clauses that set out obligations in a way that is fair to both parties. Furthermore, tenants are advised to read all clauses carefully before signing a contract and, if in doubt, to ask for explanations or legal advice. The aim is to avoid misunderstandings that can lead to conflict, and to ensure a harmonious rental relationship based on trust and mutual respect.
Transparency is a fundamental value in drawing up lease contracts that respect tenants’ rights. A transparent contract clarifies the expectations of each party and reduces the risk of disputes. For example, all additional charges and costs must be explicitly mentioned and justified in the contract, so as to avoid surprises for the tenant. In Switzerland, transparency is particularly valued by the courts, which often rule in favor of the tenant when ambiguous or misleading clauses are identified. This practice also benefits landlords, as it establishes a relationship of trust and reduces the risk of disputes. Tenancy law experts advise landlords to provide comprehensive information on the terms of the lease, particularly with regard to financial obligations, restrictions on use and the responsibilities of both parties.
To avoid disputes, certain types of clauses should be systematically avoided in lease contracts. For example, clauses imposing additional charges without justification, or clauses strictly prohibiting subletting, are often deemed abusive by Swiss courts. Other clauses to be avoided include those that impose excessive obligations on the tenant, such as taking responsibility for all maintenance work, including that normally carried out by the lessor. Such clauses are perceived as unbalanced and can be struck down by the courts. Landlords are therefore encouraged to adopt standardized contract models, validated by professional associations and tenant advocacy organizations, to ensure that their contracts comply with legal standards.
Legal advice is a crucial step in preventing abusive clauses in lease contracts, particularly in cities like Lausanne where the rental market is tight. Before signing a contract, tenants should consult a lawyer or a tenants’ association to ensure that the lease clauses respect their rights. Some associations, as well as lawyers specializing in lease law in Lausanne, offer advice and support services to help tenants identify problematic clauses and negotiate their removal or modification before signing. For their part, lessors can also benefit from legal advice to help them draw up compliant contracts and avoid future disputes. Legal advice helps to ensure that the contract complies with the principles of good faith and proportionality, thereby reducing the risk of legal challenges.
Initial consultation
from 60 min to CHF 220.00
Take points of your situation with a specialized lawyer.
You only want an appointment to ask some questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?
Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.
You will then decide if you wish to proceed and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
Take an appointment now
by calling our secretariat or by filling out the form below. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
+41 21 566 77 47