Seizure is a compulsory enforcement measure provided for under Swiss debt collection law, which takes place when the debtor has failed to pay his debt despite formal notice. Its purpose is to secure payment of debts by immobilizing certain assets of the debtor. Unlike the realization of assets, seizure is a conservatory step: it prevents the debtor from disposing of the assets concerned until they are sold to pay creditors. The debt-collection office plays a key role in this procedure, identifying seizable assets and ensuring that the rules on non-seizability are respected. This process is governed by strict standards to protect the debtor’s rights, while ensuring that creditors can enforce their claims. In addition, the execution of the seizure involves a number of stages, from inventorying the assets to securing them, while taking into account the hierarchy of claims in the event of multiple creditors.
In the canton of Vaud, the debt collection office applies federal legislation, while incorporating cantonal specificities. As a neutral intermediary, it is responsible for overseeing all stages of the seizure process, from drawing up the seizure notice to inventorying the assets. The office is obliged to assess each situation individually, in particular by identifying assets that cannot be seized, such as objects essential to daily life or tools required for a professional activity. These rules protect the debtor’s fundamental rights, while guaranteeing creditors orderly access to assets. In this canton, specific deadlines can influence the procedure, and collaboration with the office is essential to avoid administrative errors. In addition, frequent interactions with multiple creditors oblige the office to prioritize claims according to clearly defined legal criteria, such as alimony or tax debts.
The distinction between seizure and realization of assets is fundamental to Swiss debt collection law. Seizure corresponds to the immobilization of the debtor’s assets to guarantee their availability in the event of subsequent realization. It does not yet imply transfer of ownership or immediate liquidation of the assets. Realization, on the other hand, involves converting the seized assets into cash, usually through an auction or other mechanism provided for by law. This process takes place once all disputes have been resolved and claims have become enforceable. This sequentiality protects the rights of the parties while guaranteeing efficient execution. The distinction is also crucial to avoid abuses, particularly by creditors who might seek to realize the debtor’s assets prematurely without respecting the deadlines and stages prescribed by Swiss law.
The canton of Vaud has a number of special procedural features when it comes to enforcing seizures. The Vaud debt-collection office has to take account of local specificities, particularly with regard to the handling of real estate, which accounts for a large proportion of assets in this canton. Delays can vary according to the administrative burden, and particular attention is paid to the most vulnerable debtors. For example, the Vaud authorities apply rigorous criteria to determine the debtor’s minimum subsistence level, thus ensuring that the debtor retains the resources necessary for his or her subsistence. In addition, the management of multiple claims in this canton requires greater coordination between creditors, with strict application of the prioritization rules laid down by federal law. These specificities make a thorough understanding of local practices essential for the parties involved.
Under Swiss debt collection law, assets liable to seizure are determined according to their economic value and availability. Movable property, such as vehicles, jewelry or electronic devices, is a category frequently subject to seizure. Real estate can also be seized, although this requires a more complex procedure, including registration in the land register. Debtor’s claims, such as wages or bank balances, are also common in intangible seizures. The debt collection office carefully assesses each asset to ensure that it is sufficient to cover the claim, while minimizing disruption to the debtor. Third-party holders of the debtor’s assets, such as employers or banks, may be required to cooperate by virtue of their legal obligation.
Certain categories of assets enjoy special protection under Swiss law. Non-attachable assets include items necessary for daily life or the exercise of a profession, such as clothing, basic furniture or work tools. This protection is designed to ensure that the debtor can maintain a minimum standard of living and continue to generate income. Social benefits, such as family allowances or insurance payments, are also excluded from seizure, to avoid disproportionate interference with the debtor’s fundamental rights. However, unattachable assets may lose their status if their value exceeds the debtor’s current needs by an excessive amount, justifying their sale and replacement by items of lesser value.
The seizure of income, particularly wages, is a practice strictly regulated by Swiss law. Its aim is to ensure that creditors obtain satisfaction of their claims, while enabling the debtor to meet his or her basic needs. The debt collection office calculates the portion of income that can be seized by deducting a minimum subsistence amount defined by cantonal scales. These scales vary according to the debtor’s personal and family situation, such as the number of dependants or housing costs. If the debtor’s income drops unexpectedly, a review of the seizure may be requested. Employers are obliged to cooperate with the debt-collection office, on pain of sanctions. Any attempt by the debtor to circumvent the seizure of his income, such as undeclared work, constitutes a serious offence liable to criminal prosecution.
Under Swiss law, seizure is subject to a strict order of priority. Creditors with liens, such as mortgages, are given priority over ordinary creditors. The debt-collection office draws up a list of creditors and the amounts to be distributed according to this hierarchy. The scope of the seizure is limited to the amount required to cover the principal claim, interest and procedural costs. However, if additional creditors come forward before the proceedings are closed, they can participate in the seizure under certain conditions, provided the legal deadlines are met. This strictly controlled participation mechanism prevents abuse and ensures equal treatment of all creditors. In the event of a dispute over priority, the parties can take the matter to court.
The execution of a seizure follows a procedure strictly governed by Swiss law, designed to ensure fairness between creditor and debtor. It begins with the issue of a seizure notice by the debt collection office, which is notified to the debtor. This document contains essential information such as the amount to be seized, the creditors involved, and the assets identified for seizure. At this stage, the debtor is required to cooperate with the debt-collection office by providing information about his assets. In the event of refusal or false declaration, the debtor is liable to sanctions, including fines. Once the assets have been identified, the Office draws up a detailed inventory and carries out checks to ensure that the assets are indeed seizable and do not belong to third parties. According to federal case law, the office must ensure that the seizure is proportional, taking care not to exceed the amount necessary to cover the claim.
Notification of the seizure is a crucial step in ensuring that the debtor is informed of the measures taken against him. This notification can be made by post, or, in exceptional cases, by hand delivery. Once notified, the debtor has a period of time in which to contest the seizure, particularly if he or she believes that certain seized assets are exempt from seizure, or that the amount claimed is incorrect. The objection must be substantiated and accompanied by evidence. The debt collection office must clearly inform the debtor of his rights and obligations throughout the procedure, including deadlines and the consequences of non-cooperation. The law also requires the debt-collection office to document all stages of the procedure, to ensure transparency and enable subsequent monitoring by creditors or the debtor.
Creditors play an active role in the seizure procedure. They must ensure that their interests are safeguarded by providing the debt-collection office with complete and accurate information on their claims. If several creditors are involved in the seizure, the debt-collection office draws up a distribution plan in accordance with the priority rules laid down by law. Creditors may also ask the debt-collection office to take security measures, such as sealing certain assets, to prevent them from being dissipated or misappropriated before they are realized. Creditors also have a right of appeal if they consider that the debt-collection office has not carried out the seizure correctly, or if their rights have been prejudiced. According to case law, this remedy can sometimes include claims relating to the incorrect valuation of seized assets.
Seizure is a procedure governed by strict deadlines. The debt collection office must act quickly to prevent the debtor’s assets from losing value or being dissipated. Once the seizure has been carried out, the assets must be sold within a reasonable timeframe, except in the case of assets whose preservation is essential to the debtor. Creditors must also respect deadlines for asserting their participation rights or contesting a decision by the office. As far as costs are concerned, these include the fees for executing the seizure, the costs of transporting and storing the seized goods, and the costs of publishing the auction sale, where applicable. These costs are generally borne by the debtor, but may be advanced by creditors, particularly if the debtor is insolvent. The regulations also specify that excessive costs may be the subject of a request for review by the parties concerned.
Once the seizure has been executed, the debtor is prohibited from disposing of the seized assets. This prohibition applies not only to the sale of goods, but also to their transfer or pledging. The aim is to protect creditors’ rights by preventing the debtor from disposing of the assets before they have been realized. This prohibition is accompanied by control measures put in place by the debt-collection office, such as marking assets or placing them under seal. Any act of disposal carried out in breach of this prohibition is considered null and void, and may result in criminal penalties for the debtor. In addition, this restriction may extend to certain intangible rights, such as share dividends or receivables held by the debtor, which must be paid directly to the debt collection office. Property subject to legal inalienability clauses remains protected, however.
Seizure has immediate and lasting consequences on the debtor’s assets. It leads to a significant reduction in assets, which may affect the debtor’s ability to meet other financial obligations or obtain new credit. Seized assets are often sold at public auction, a procedure that can result in a loss of value compared to their initial estimate. This depreciation can worsen the debtor’s financial situation, especially if the sums obtained are not sufficient to cover the entire debt. In addition, seizure can have repercussions on the debtor’s reputation, particularly if third parties such as business partners or customers become aware of the proceedings. Swiss law also requires auctions to be published, thus reinforcing the public impact of the seizure on the debtor.
Third parties may also be affected by the seizure, particularly if they hold assets belonging to the debtor. These third parties are obliged to cooperate with the debt-collection office by providing information on the assets concerned and making them available. Failure to cooperate may result in criminal and civil penalties. In addition, non-participating creditors can request to be included in the seizure procedure by providing evidence of their claims. This right is subject to strict deadlines and requires a formal decision by the debt collection office. Creditor participation is governed by priority rules which determine the order in which claims are satisfied. The legal provisions also provide for a specific procedure for third-party claims on seized assets, particularly in the case of co-ownership or assets assigned to common use.
Swiss law provides specific mechanisms for the participation of creditors in a pending seizure. These mechanisms aim to ensure a fair distribution of seized assets, while respecting legal priorities. Creditors must file a request with the debt-collection office to participate in the distribution of seized assets. This request must be accompanied by proof of the claim, such as a contract or court decision. Third parties who claim ownership of the seized goods can also intervene in the proceedings by filing an action for revendication. This action is examined by the courts, which determine whether the goods should be returned to the third party or realized to satisfy the creditors. According to Swiss case law, such claims must be processed within strict deadlines to avoid paralysis of the proceedings.
Initial consultation
from 60 min to CHF 220.00
Take points of your situation with a specialized lawyer.
You only want an appointment to ask some questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?
Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.
You will then decide if you wish to proceed and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
Take an appointment now
by calling our secretariat or by filling out the form below. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.
+41 21 566 77 47